TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal allowed: Duty demand for 'Kwality' Ice Cream set aside due to time limit breach.</h1> <h3>KWALITY ICE CREAM CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, ALLAHABAD</h3> The appeal was allowed as the impugned order demanding duty for Ice Cream sold under the brand name 'Kwality' was set aside due to the show cause notice ... Demand - Limitation - SSI Exemption The appeal involved the availability of benefit of Notification No. 175/86 for Ice Cream sold under the brand name 'Kwality'. The show cause notice for duty demand was beyond the normal six-month period specified in Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The Department was aware of the brand name use by the appellants, so suppression of facts cannot be alleged. The impugned order was set aside on the time limit issue, and the appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
