Strict construction of exemption notification denied concession for ship-breaking waste and scrap outside specified tariff headings.

Waste and scrap arising from breaking up an imported dredger did not qualify for the concessional rate under Notification No. 54/86-C.E. because the exemption was limited to waste and scrap falling within the specified tariff headings. Although the condition relating to prior import of the ship on payment of appropriate customs duty was met, the goods were classifiable under the tariff entry applicable to material from ship-breaking, taking them outside the notification. The text emphasises that exemption notifications must be strictly construed, and non-fulfilment of any stated condition defeats the claim to exemption.

---

---

Issues: Whether the goods, being waste and scrap arising from breaking up of an imported dredger, were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 54/86-C.E. at serial No. 3.

Analysis: The relevant notification granted concessional treatment only to waste and scrap falling under the specified tariff entries. Although the condition regarding the ship having been imported into India on payment of appropriate customs duty was satisfied, the notification covered waste and scrap under the stated tariff headings, whereas the goods in question arose from breaking up of ships and therefore fell under the specific tariff entry applicable to such material. Since the declared origin of the goods brought them outside the scope of the notification, the exemption could not be extended. Exemption notifications are to be strictly construed, and failure to satisfy any condition defeats the claim.

Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 54/86-C.E. was not available to the assessees, and the demand for differential duty was sustained.

---