Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand by inclusion of packing charges was sustainable in view of the earlier decision on the same issue and the assessee's contention on limitation and penalty.
Analysis: The assessee's case was that the packing charges had already been taken into account in the assessable value and that the same issue had been decided by the Tribunal in its favour for the relevant period. The earlier Tribunal findings recorded that there was no dispute that the packing charges for the stated period had already been included in the assessable value and that no separate packing charges were incurred at the depot for packing, with no merit found in the Revenue's appeal. Relying on those findings on the identical issue, the appellate authority found no merit in the impugned order.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and relief was granted to the assessee.