Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the duty demand should be dispensed with and recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The applicants claimed exemption under Notification No. 24/91 dated 25-7-1991 and relied on certificates showing installed capacity within the notified limit, while the department relied on an earlier industrial licence to contend that the installed capacity exceeded the limit. On the material placed, the applicants showed a strong prima facie case as to eligibility for the notification. Heavy accumulated losses and sick-unit status were also relevant to the request for interim relief.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was dispensed with and recovery of the duty was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.