Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods were classifiable under Heading 3815.90 and entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/94 as amended, or whether they fell under Heading 2909.60 by virtue of the exclusion of well-defined chemicals under Chapter 38.
Analysis: The notification could not control the interpretation of the tariff. Classification had to be determined from the wording of the tariff entry read with the Section Notes and Chapter Notes. Chapter Note 1(a) to Chapter 38 excluded well-defined chemicals from that chapter. Since the product was treated as a well-defined chemical, it was liable to be assessed under the heading applicable to peroxides and not under Chapter 38 merely because a similar chemical had been brought within the notification by amendment.
Conclusion: The claim to classification under Heading 3815.90 with the benefit of Notification No. 32/94 failed, and the assessment under Heading 2909.60 was upheld against the assessee.