Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pond aerators used in aquafarms for prawn culture were machinery for production of commodities so as to qualify for the benefit of Notification No. 49/95 dated 16-3-1995 under Tariff Heading 8479.89.
Analysis: The expression "production of commodities" was construed in its ordinary and common parlance sense, as the notification did not define its scope. Full-grown prawns were treated as articles of trade, while the seedlings introduced into the farm were regarded as only the starting material that acquires tradeable value after nourishment and growth. On that basis, prawn culture was viewed as a production process bringing into existence a marketable commodity. The interpretation was also informed by the need to account for technological advancement in a dynamic manner.
Conclusion: The pond aerators were held to be machinery used for production of commodities, and the notification benefit was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A farming or culture process that transforms non-tradeable input into a tradeable commodity through growth and nourishment can amount to production of commodities for tariff or exemption purposes, and tariff entries must be interpreted dynamically in light of technological developments.