Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit under Rule 57Q was admissible on the disputed items claimed as capital goods, parts or components of capital goods, and whether credit on the chemical spray was allowable.
Analysis: The disputed items, other than the chemical spray, were found to be spares and components of the plant and machinery installed in the factory for manufacturing synthetic rubber and ethyl alcohol. Such items were treated as essential spares and components of capital goods and therefore eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q. The chemical spray used for dye penetrant test was not shown to be capital goods or a qualifying component.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on the disputed parts as capital goods except for credit of Rs. 2,392 on the chemical spray, which was disallowed.