Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether oil seals and gaskets used in the machinery were admissible as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The goods were found to perform a vital function in operating the machinery. The then-existing Explanation to Rule 57Q did not specifically name oil seals and gaskets, but it covered components, spare parts and accessories of machinery. That description was considered wide enough to include the impugned goods, and no infirmity was found in the conclusion that their admissibility could not be denied merely because they were consumables.
Conclusion: The goods were held admissible as capital goods under Rule 57Q, and the challenge by the Revenue failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the Collector (Appeals) finding allowing the goods as capital goods was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods form part of the machinery's effective operation and fall within the description of components, spare parts or accessories in the governing explanation, they are admissible as capital goods even if not specifically named.