Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 52/86-C.E. could be denied where off-specification glass bottles, already entered in RG 1 and kept in the bonded store room, were remelted and used for manufacturing other glass and glassware.
Analysis: The goods, though brought into RG 1 and the bonded store room, had become off specification and were not saleable. The only practical use was to remelt them and convert them into other glass and glassware. The notification was found not to exclude such use merely because the goods had been entered in RG 1 or stored in bond. The Revenue's objection was treated as one of procedural control over removal from the bonded store room, and no language in the notification supported denial of the exemption on that ground.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 52/86-C.E. was admissible on the facts, and the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The decision upheld exemption treatment for discarded, non-marketable glass goods remelted within the factory for further manufacture of glass and glassware, and the Revenue did not succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification covering in-factory use of glass and glassware for further manufacture cannot be denied merely because the goods were previously entered in RG 1 and stored in bond, where they are off specification, non-marketable, and are actually remelted for manufacture of other glass and glassware.