Tariff classification of lead glass tubing turns on actual character after processing and predominant end-use, not minor ancillary use.

Lead glass tubings and rods remained classifiable as unworked tubes and rods because processing beyond annealing and cutting, including glazing and diameter sorting, did not change their essential character. Predominant use in electric light bulbs and fluorescent lighting supported classification under Tariff Heading 7008.10, while minimal use in glow switches was not enough to shift them to Tariff sub-heading 7001.90. The stated principle is that tariff classification depends on the goods' actual character after processing and their predominant end-use; incidental ancillary use will not alter the proper classification.

---

---

Issues: Whether lead glass tubings and rods manufactured by the respondents were classifiable under Tariff Heading 7008.10 or Tariff sub-heading 7001.90.

Analysis: The goods had undergone processes beyond annealing and cutting, including glazing and diameter sorting, but these did not make the goods worked in a manner that would take them out of the category of unworked tubes and rods. The material also showed that the goods were predominantly used for electric light bulbs and fluorescent lighting, with only minimal use in glow switches. On this basis, the classification adopted by the lower appellate authority was found to be sustainable.

Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Tariff Heading 7008.10 and not under Tariff sub-heading 7001.90.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the classification failed, and the order in favour of the respondents was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, goods are to be classified according to their actual character after processing and their predominant end-use, and minimal ancillary use will not displace the proper classification.

---