Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice for reassessment under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid where assessment proceedings had earlier been initiated under section 22(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 but no assessment order had been passed within the period of limitation.
Analysis: Proceedings initiated by a notice under section 22(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 do not prevent the income from being treated as escaped assessment if those proceedings are not brought to a final assessment order before the statutory period expires. The earlier authorities show that escaped assessment is not confined to cases where no return was filed; it also covers cases where a return or notice exists but no effective assessment results. Once the assessment year remained unassessed after the limitation period, the Income-tax Officer could invoke the reassessment provisions under section 147(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and issue notice under section 148.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was valid, and the challenge to it failed. The contention based on the pendency of the earlier proceedings did not succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: Income may be said to have escaped assessment even where earlier assessment proceedings were initiated, if no assessment order is made and the assessment becomes barred by limitation, enabling reassessment under section 147(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.