Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether additional trade discount was deductible from the assessable value of the goods; (ii) whether secondary packing charges were deductible from the assessable value.
Issue (i): whether additional trade discount was deductible from the assessable value of the goods.
Analysis: Deduction of additional trade discount depended on the actual material produced to show the discount granted by the principal to its dealers. The quantum of deduction could not extend beyond the amount actually established by invoices, records, or other supporting documents, and required verification by the Department.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction of additional trade discount was upheld only to the extent supported by the requisite material and verification, and the finding in that regard was not interfered with.
Issue (ii): whether secondary packing charges were deductible from the assessable value.
Analysis: Secondary packing not required for putting the goods into the stream of wholesale trade at the factory gate was not part of the assessable value. On the facts, the Department did not establish that the packing charges related to packing necessary for wholesale trade, or that the packing was other than secondary packing.
Conclusion: Secondary packing charges were held deductible from the assessable value.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the deductions failed, and the order allowing the deductions was sustained.