Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could be stayed and the pre-deposit of penalty waived under Section 35F of the same Act. (ii) Whether the order of confiscation of plant, machinery and other assets should be kept in abeyance pending disposal of the proceedings.
Issue (i): Whether the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 could be stayed and the pre-deposit of penalty waived under Section 35F of the same Act.
Analysis: Section 11AC provides for mandatory penalty equal to the duty determined as short levied, but the power to dispense with deposit under Section 35F remains available to the appellate authority. The two provisions operate in different fields: Section 11AC governs the final penalty on adjudication, whereas Section 35F governs interim relief pending appeal. The voluntary payment of the entire duty also supported waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit of the penalty was waived.
Issue (ii): Whether the order of confiscation of plant, machinery and other assets should be kept in abeyance pending disposal of the proceedings.
Analysis: Since the appeal was pending and the applicants undertook not to dispose of the assets, the confiscation order was treated as capable of being suspended during the pendency of the matter, subject to security to protect the Revenue's interest.
Conclusion: The confiscation order was held in abeyance pending disposal of the case.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted by dispensing with pre-deposit of penalty and suspending the confiscation order during the pendency of the appeal, subject to the stated safeguards.
Ratio Decidendi: The appellate power under Section 35F to dispense with pre-deposit is not curtailed by the mandatory nature of penalty under Section 11AC at the stage of final adjudication.