Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the confirmed central excise duty and stay of recovery during pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The dispute concerned inclusion of dealers' advertisement expenses in the assessable value. The question whether such expenditure was optional or mandatory, and whether it created any nexus between the appellants and the dealers, was left for consideration at the hearing of the main appeal. In the meantime, the cited precedent on dealer advertisement expenses disclosed a strong prima facie case for interim relief.
Outcome: The requirement of pre-deposit of the entire duty was waived and recovery was stayed during pendency of the appeal.