Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods described as "Copper Cast Articles Machined" were correctly classifiable under Tariff Item 7419.99 or, if they were copper end rings and bushes identifiable as parts of submersible pumps, under Tariff Item 84.13 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The record showed a conflict between the description in the classification and adjudication proceedings and the appellant's claim that the goods were end rings and bushes supplied as per buyers' drawings and meant for pumps. No finding had been recorded in the adjudication or appellate order on the essential question whether the items were in fact identifiable parts of pumps. If they were so identifiable, the claim for classification under Tariff Item 84.13 would be sustainable.
Conclusion: The classification issue was not finally determined on merits and the matter was sent back for fresh decision after giving the appellant an opportunity to present its case.