Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to retain or adjust duty collected from buyers after the goods became exempt from central excise duty, and whether the balance Modvat credit lying in RG 23A Part II as on the exemption date had already lapsed.
Analysis: The balance credit in RG 23A Part II had been ordered to be expunged and treated as lapsed, and that finding had attained finality as no appeal was filed by the respondents. On that basis, there was no available credit balance on or after the exemption date. The respondents, having collected central excise duty from buyers after the goods were exempted under Notification No. 101/94-C.E., could not claim that the amount was adjusted against existing credit or avoid remitting the amount merely because the duty had been collected from customers.
Conclusion: The respondents were not entitled to retain the duty collected after the exemption and the Revenue's challenge succeeded.