Modvat credit dispute and undue hardship assessment led to reduced pre-deposit, adjustment of prior deposit, and stay of recovery.

The Tribunal treated the admissibility of Modvat credit as a contentious issue and considered that the authorities had relied on a period after the relevant change requiring the triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry as a prescribed document. It also took account of the appellant's financial loss shown in the balance sheet and the overall facts, circumstances and cited case law in assessing undue hardship. Full waiver of pre-deposit was refused, but a reduced deposit of Rs. 2 lakh was ordered, the amount already deposited under the detention order was allowed to be adjusted, the detention order was set aside, and recovery of the balance duty was stayed pending appeal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit in the stay application and whether the amount already deposited pursuant to the detention order could be adjusted.

Analysis: The Tribunal found that the question of admissibility of Modvat credit was contentious and that the authorities relied on a period after the relevant change making the triplicate copy of the Bill of Entry a prescribed document. It also noted the appellant's financial loss as reflected in the balance sheet and considered the overall facts and circumstances, including the cited case law, while assessing undue hardship.

Conclusion: Full waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but the appellant was directed to deposit a reduced amount of Rs. 2 lakh, with the amount already deposited under the detention order allowed to be adjusted and the detention order set aside. Recovery of the balance duty was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.

---