Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to waiver of the full pre-deposit of duty and penalty in a stay application concerning denial of Modvat credit on air-conditioners claimed as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The dispute required examination of the scope of capital goods under Rule 57Q and the role of the air-conditioners in the manufacture of hair dye. The issue was considered arguable, but the merits could not be gone into in detail at the stay stage.
Conclusion: Full waiver was not granted. The applicants were directed to deposit Rs. 30,000, and on such deposit the balance duty and penalty stood dispensed with and recovery remained stayed.