Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether intermediate excisable goods manufactured by a job worker from raw material received under Rule 57F(2) and cleared under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. are to be included in computing the aggregate value of clearances for availing exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured by the job worker from raw materials received from the principal manufacturer under Rule 57F(2) and were covered by the exemption under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The clearances of such fully exempt goods were, therefore, not liable to be counted for determining the aggregate value of clearances for the small scale exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E.
Conclusion: The clearances of the job-worker's exempt goods were not includible in the aggregate turnover computation under Notification No. 175/86-C.E., and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The exemption available to the job-worker's clearances was upheld, and the departmental challenge to the exclusion of such clearances from the small scale exemption calculation was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Fully exempt clearances of job-worked intermediate goods are not to be included in the aggregate value of clearances for the purpose of determining eligibility under a small scale exemption notification.