Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether spent nickel catalyst, cleared as residue after use in manufacture, was liable to central excise duty despite the availment of Modvat credit on the input nickel catalyst and the exemption under Notification No. 19/88-C.E.
Analysis: The residue cleared by the assessee was not nickel catalyst as such but waste obtained after its use in the manufacture of the final product. Rule 57D(1) of the Central Excise Rules protected Modvat credit in respect of inputs contained in waste or refuse. Rule 57F(4) permitted removal of waste arising from processing of inputs, with duty, if any, determined on the date of removal. Since spent nickel catalyst fell within Chapter 26 and was wholly exempt from duty under Notification No. 19/88-C.E. on the relevant date, no duty was payable on its clearance.
Conclusion: The demand of duty and penalty could not be sustained, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.