Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on duty paid flattened metal containers was admissible when the containers were reformed and used in the manufacture of prepared and preserved food packed in unit containers, notwithstanding the exemption notification for reformed metal containers.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that reformed metal containers did not constitute the final product in the assessee's case. The decisive consideration was that the assessee's final product was prepared and preserved food put up in unit containers, which was dutiable. The exemption notification for reformed metal containers did not alter the character of the actual final product nor justify denial of credit on the flattened containers used as inputs. The process of converting flattened containers into reformed containers was treated as not amounting to a separate manufacturing result displacing the assessee's entitlement to Modvat credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on duty paid flattened metal containers was admissible and denial of the credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification for reformed containers does not by itself deny Modvat credit on duty paid inputs where the assessee's final dutiable product is different and the intermediate reformation does not constitute the relevant final product.