Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the gold, silver and the car were liable to confiscation on the basis of the material available, and whether the penalties imposed on the appellants were sustainable.
Analysis: The goods did not bear foreign markings and were not in a form or purity typically associated with smuggled goods. The record contained no independent evidence that the goods had been brought from Nepal or otherwise smuggled, and the fact that the articles were found in a secret cavity created only suspicion and did not amount to proof. Specific information received by the officers was only a trigger for action and could not by itself establish the smuggled character of the goods. In the absence of evidence gathered after seizure to prove foreign origin, the foundation for confiscation failed. The Board circular on seizure of silver was also relevant, and subordinate customs authorities were bound to follow it.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to confiscation and the penalties could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Suspicion, including concealment in a secret cavity, cannot substitute for proof of smuggled character; confiscation under the Customs law requires material evidence establishing foreign origin, and binding administrative circulars must be followed by subordinate customs .