Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bituminised hessian based felt was correctly classifiable under Heading 68.07 of the Central Excise Tariff or under Sub-heading 5909.00.
Analysis: Heading 68.07 applies to articles of stone, plaster, cement, asbestos, mica or similar materials, and the phrase "similar materials" must be read in the context of the materials specifically enumerated in the heading. On the facts described, bitumen could not be treated as similar to those materials. The product was also examined with reference to the exclusion in Chapter Note (C) of Chapter 68 and the classification adopted by the appellate authority under Sub-heading 5909.00 for other textile products and articles suitable for industrial use.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Heading 68.07 and were correctly classifiable under Sub-heading 5909.00; the Revenue's challenge failed.