Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applied so as to require payment of 8% of the price of bio-compost fertiliser manufactured from press mud and spent wash, when the duty-paid inputs were used only in the manufacture of sugar, molasses and denatured ethyl alcohol.
Analysis: Rule 57CC is attracted only when the same credit availed inputs are used, directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of both dutiable and exempted final products. On the facts, the inputs were used at the initial stage for manufacturing the assessee's dutiable products, and press mud and spent wash emerged only as inevitable wastes. No further credit availed inputs or chemicals were added in the process of converting those wastes into bio-compost. The mere presence of traces of chemicals in the wastes or in the final compost did not establish use of the modvatted inputs in the manufacture of the exempted product. The cases relied on by the Revenue were distinguishable, while the decisions supporting the assessee applied the same principle to similar facts.
Conclusion: Rule 57CC was not applicable and the demand of 8% on the price of bio-compost fertiliser was unsustainable.