Specific tariff entry prevails over residuary heading for prepared vermicelli; bona fide classification dispute bars extended limitation.

Prepared vermicelli mixed with sugar, milk powder, cashew, elaichi and raisins remained classifiable under Chapter Heading 19.02, because a specific tariff entry for vermicelli could not be displaced by the residuary Chapter Heading 21.07 for edible preparations. The Tribunal treated the product as a prepared vermicelli item, not a distinct edible preparation. On limitation, the assessee's view of non-dutiability or exemption was held bona fide, so failure to file classification or declaration did not amount to suppression of facts. The extended period was therefore not invocable, and the demand was barred by limitation.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the product marketed as Bambino Vermicellini Kheer was classifiable under Chapter Heading 19.02 as vermicelli, or under Chapter Heading 21.07 as an edible preparation; (ii) whether the demand was sustainable for want of classification/declaration and suppression of facts, including invocation of the larger period.

Issue (i): whether the product marketed as Bambino Vermicellini Kheer was classifiable under Chapter Heading 19.02 as vermicelli, or under Chapter Heading 21.07 as an edible preparation.

Analysis: The product consisted essentially of vermicelli mixed with sugar powder, milk powder, cashew, elaichi and raisins. Vermicelli, whether or not prepared, was specifically covered by Chapter Heading 19.02, while Chapter Heading 21.07 was a residuary heading for edible preparations not elsewhere specified or included. A specific entry could not be displaced by a generic residuary entry. The HSN notes relied upon also supported the view that preparations within the pasta/vermicelli group could be cooked or otherwise prepared without losing their basic identity. The Tribunal found that the item remained a prepared vermicelli product and did not become a distinct edible preparation of the kind covered by Chapter 21.

Conclusion: The product was classifiable under Chapter Heading 19.02 and not under Chapter Heading 21.07.

Issue (ii): whether the demand was sustainable for want of classification/declaration and suppression of facts, including invocation of the larger period.

Analysis: Since Chapter Heading 19.02 specifically covered vermicelli, the assessee's view that the goods were non-dutiable or exempt was held to be bona fide. In that background, the non-filing of classification list and declaration did not amount to suppression of facts warranting the extended period. The exemption notification referred to by the assessee reinforced the bona fide nature of its stand.

Conclusion: The demand was barred by limitation and the extended period was not invocable.

Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the department was set aside, and the appeal succeeded on merits as well as on limitation.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are specifically covered by a tariff heading, they must be classified there and cannot be shifted to a residuary heading merely because they are in a prepared form; a bona fide classification dispute negates suppression for extended limitation.

---