Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was barred from claiming depreciation under Section 32 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 on the portion of duty on capital goods for which Cenvat credit was not taken in the first financial year, and whether the demand, interest and penalty could survive.
Analysis: Rule 4(2)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules permits only fifty per cent of the duty on capital goods to be taken as credit in the year of receipt, while Rule 4(2)(b) permits the balance credit in a subsequent year if the capital goods remain in use. Rule 4(4) prohibits Cenvat credit only in respect of that part of the duty value on which depreciation is claimed. On the facts, the assessee took credit only on fifty per cent in the first year and claimed depreciation only on the remaining portion on which no credit had been availed. The restriction in Rule 4(4), therefore, was not breached.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on the unavailed portion without violating the Cenvat Credit Rules, and the adverse orders could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the credit scheme itself restricts immediate Cenvat credit to fifty per cent of the duty on capital goods, depreciation may be claimed on the remaining portion not taken as credit, because Rule 4(4) bars only credit on the same duty component on which depreciation is actually claimed.