Retrospective exemption refunds remain subject to statutory refund controls, including Section 11B restrictions and buyer-pass-on limits.

Refund claims arising from a retrospective exemption remained subject to Section 11B of the Central Excises Act, 1944, including the restrictions in sub-section (2), even though duty had been paid during the exempted period. The retrospective operation of the exemption did not displace the statutory refund machinery, and the special refund mechanism in the retrospective exemption Act did not exclude that control. Recomputing assessable value on a cum-duty basis and treating the duty as recovered from buyers was considered irrelevant to the entitlement issue. The unconditional refund order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh determination under the statutory framework.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund claims arising from retrospective exemption under the Central Duties of Excise (Retrospective Exemption) Act, 1986 were governed by Section 11B(2) of the Central Excises Act, 1944 and whether the refund could be limited on the basis that the duty element had been recovered from buyers.

Analysis: The refund claimed arose because the exemption notification was retrospectively revived for the period during which duty had been paid. The entitlement was therefore to refund of duty that was not legally payable at all during that period. In such a situation, recomputation of assessable value and deduction of a presumed duty component on the footing of cum-duty price was held to have no relevance. The Court further held that refund claims consequent on the retrospective exemption enactment were still governed by Section 11B of the Central Excises Act, 1944, including the restrictions introduced by sub-section (2), and that the special refund machinery in the retrospective exemption Act did not exclude that statutory control.

Conclusion: The refund claims were subject to Section 11B(2) of the Central Excises Act, 1944, and the matter required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority on that basis.

Final Conclusion: The order granting unconditional refund was set aside and the refund dispute was sent back for fresh determination under the statutory refund framework.

Ratio Decidendi: A refund claim arising from retrospective exemption is governed by Section 11B of the Central Excises Act, 1944, and the statutory conditions attached to refund cannot be avoided merely because the exemption operates retrospectively.

---