Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether stay against the order of the Collector (Appeals) should be granted in view of Condition No. (vi) of Customs Notification No. 204/92 when Modvat credit had been reversed before import under the transferred licence.
Analysis: The request for stay was examined on a prima facie basis. The Tribunal found that the exports had been made on prior export basis, not after obtaining the DEEC licence, and that the subsequent reversal of Modvat credit created a prima facie situation where denial of duty-free import was not justified. The Tribunal also noted that the condition appeared intended to prevent double benefit, and that once one benefit was foregone, denial of the other benefit was not readily sustainable. At the same time, the Tribunal considered it appropriate to protect revenue by requiring a personal bond for the duty amount.
Conclusion: Blanket stay was refused, but the applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond covering the duty amount so that the departmental order could be implemented.