Small-scale industry exemption and export proof dispute remanded for fresh adjudication on supporting documents.

Denial of small-scale industry exemption for alleged lack of export proof under Rule 14A was considered unsuitable for final determination on the existing record. The appellants had produced export-related documents for part of the goods and stated that the remaining H forms were received later; it was also noted that some documents already accepted by the Assistant Collector had been filed after six months. In these circumstances, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, with the jurisdictional authority to allow the appellants an opportunity to produce the supporting export documents.

---

---

Issues: Whether the duty demand denying small-scale industry exemption for want of proof of export under Rule 14A required interference and remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The appellants had produced export-related documents for part of the goods, and they asserted that the remaining proof in the form of H forms was received later. It was also noticed that even some of the documents accepted by the Assistant Collector had been produced after six months. In these circumstances, the matter was considered fit for fresh adjudication with an opportunity to produce the relevant documents before the jurisdictional authority.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after giving the appellants an opportunity to produce the supporting export documents.

---