Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts of transformers falling under Heading 85.04 were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 160/86-C.E., or stood excluded from the exemption.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption to goods specified in the relevant table and falling under the stated tariff heading, while expressly excluding only transformers and chokes for fluorescent tubes from the coverage of Heading 85.04. Parts of transformers were goods falling under the same heading and were not specifically excluded by the notification. In the absence of an express exclusion, the benefit of the exemption could not be denied merely because the goods were parts of transformers.
Conclusion: The benefit of Notification No. 160/86-C.E. was available to parts of transformers, and the denial of exemption was incorrect.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed, with the exemption held admissible for the disputed goods.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification applies to goods classified under a specified tariff heading, the benefit cannot be denied to a sub-category of those goods unless that sub-category is expressly excluded.