Prima facie case and pre-deposit in customs penalty disputes: Tribunal required deposit, waived balance penalty, and stayed recovery on compliance.

Statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, together with surrounding circumstances, were relied on to treat the gold as smuggled and sustain penalties. The Tribunal found that the applicants had not established a strong prima facie case for unconditional stay or complete waiver of pre-deposit, but considered the overall facts and their financial condition in fixing the deposit requirement. Pre-deposit of specified amounts was directed within eight weeks, with waiver of the balance penalty and a bar on recovery upon compliance; failure to comply would expose the appeals to dismissal.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellants had made out a strong prima facie case for unconditional stay and waiver of pre-deposit, and what pre-deposit, if any, should be directed.

Analysis: The order records that statements were made under Section 108 of the Customs Act and that the adjudicating authority had relied on those statements and the surrounding circumstances to hold the gold to be smuggled and to impose penalties. The Tribunal found that the applicants did not have a strong prima facie case, but took into account the overall facts and the financial condition of the applicants while considering the extent of pre-deposit.

Outcome: The appellants were directed to pre-deposit specified amounts within eight weeks, with waiver of the balance penalty and bar on recovery upon compliance; failing compliance, the appeals were liable to be dismissed.

---