Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the benefit of Notification No. 208/83 was available to malleable iron castings falling under Tariff Item 25(16)(i), and whether the requirement of carbon content of 1.9% or more applied to such castings for claiming the exemption.
Analysis: The relevant tariff explanation made the 1.9% carbon-content criterion applicable to pig iron and cast iron falling under Tariff Item 25(1). That criterion was not shown to govern iron castings falling under Tariff Item 25(16)(i), which are distinct products. Since the notification covered iron castings and steel scrap appeared as an input in the notification table, the lower carbon content found in the samples did not justify denial of the exemption to the assessee.
Conclusion: The notification benefit was rightly extended to the assessee, and the Revenue's attempt to apply the 1.9% carbon-content requirement to iron castings failed.