Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal trial could be adjourned for a reasonable period under Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 pending disposal of the appeal before the FERA Board, and whether the Magistrate's refusal to adjourn the matter required interference.
Analysis: Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 permits adjournment or postponement only for reasons to be recorded and for a specified reasonable period. The power is discretionary and must be exercised judicially so that the criminal proceeding is not frustrated, while also recognising that a parallel proceeding may have a bearing on the criminal case. An indefinite suspension of the trial is not permissible, but where the connected appellate proceeding may affect the criminal case, a short and defined adjournment can be granted. On the facts, the trial had reached the final stage, yet the pending appeal before the FERA Board could still have a bearing on the prosecution.
Conclusion: The refusal to grant any adjournment was set aside, and a limited postponement of the criminal trial for a specified period was allowed in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 authorises only a judicially controlled, time-bound adjournment on recorded reasons, and not an indefinite postponement of a criminal trial because of pending collateral proceedings.