Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Desmodur L-67 was classifiable under Tariff Heading 2929.10 or under Tariff Heading 3909.50.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on the description of the product and the effect of the chapter notes. The product had earlier been considered by the Tribunal in decisions relied upon by the assessee, and those decisions had taken into account the relevant chapter notes. The product was described as a trade mark for a group of isocyanates and isocyanate prepolymers used for urethane coatings, foams and adhesives. Even though it was a prepolymer, the reasoning accepted that it fell within Chapter 29 rather than Chapter 39, and the objection based on Chapter Note 3(e) was rejected.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable under Tariff Heading 2929.10 and not under Tariff Heading 3909.50, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A product described as an isocyanate prepolymer remains classifiable under Chapter 29 where the relevant tariff notes and prior classification rulings support that classification, notwithstanding an objection under Chapter 39.