Classification of PET chip waste required fresh factual determination on transformation into primary form before Chapter 39 treatment.

Classification of polycondensation waste in lump form generated during PET chips manufacture could not be determined on the existing record because the factual basis was incomplete. The key issue was whether the material had been transformed into a primary form and therefore fell outside the waste, parings and scraps exclusion under Chapter 39. As the record did not clearly establish the method of generation or utilisation of the product, the classification question could not be decided conclusively at that stage. The matter was remitted to the Assistant Collector for fresh determination after a reasonable opportunity of hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the classification of polycondensation waste in lump form generated during manufacture of PET chips could be decided on the existing record, and whether the matter required remand for fresh determination.

Analysis: The material record did not clearly show whether the waste had undergone any transformation into primary form. Classification depended on ascertaining how the impugned product was generated and whether it fell within the exclusion applicable to waste, parings and scraps transformed into primary forms under Chapter 39. As the factual basis necessary for proper classification was incomplete, the matter could not be conclusively decided on merits at that stage.

Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Assistant Collector to determine the method of generation and utilisation of the product and to decide the classification afresh after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellants.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent of remand, leaving the substantive classification question open for reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.

---