Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refractory bricks manufactured within the factory and used for repairing the kiln installed in the factory were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 281/86-C.E. despite being the assessee's primary product.
Analysis: The notification was held to cover all excisable goods required for maintenance of machinery or equipment installed in the factory, and did not make any distinction based on whether the goods were ordinarily manufactured by the assessee as its main product. Since the refractory bricks were manufactured in the factory and used for maintenance of the kiln, the workshop was treated as co-extensive with the factory for the purpose of the exemption.
Conclusion: The exemption under Notification No. 281/86-C.E. was admissible, and denial of the benefit was unsustainable.