Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported continuous ingredient feeder was classifiable as refrigerating equipment under Heading 84.15 of the Customs Tariff or as a machine or mechanical appliance under Heading 84.59(1).
Analysis: The feeder was imported by itself and, on the product literature, was meant only for continuous metering and blending of ingredients such as fruits, nuts and candies into ice cream or other pumpable products. It had no refrigerating function and was not imported with any refrigerating equipment. It also did not itself produce any commodity; it merely mixed ingredients into the ice cream stream. On that basis, it could not be classified under Heading 84.15 or under the alternative head claimed by the appellant for machines designed for production of commodities.
Conclusion: The feeder was correctly classified under Heading 84.59(1) of the Customs Tariff as a machine or mechanical appliance not elsewhere specified, and the appellant's challenge failed.