Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether scrap arising from the appellant's unit was classifiable as scrap of iron under sub-heading 7204.10 or as other ferrous waste and scrap under sub-heading 7204.90.
Analysis: Heading 72.04 covered ferrous waste and scrap, with sub-heading 7204.10 confined to scrap of iron and sub-heading 7204.90 covering the residuary category. The scrap in question arose from the use of mild steel or non-alloy steel, and there was no basis to treat it as scrap of iron merely because iron and steel are regarded as one and the same metal in Note 5 to Section XV for the limited purpose of classification of composite articles by predominance of weight. The note did not support the claim that scrap of non-alloy steel could be classified as iron scrap. Trade nomenclature could not alter the clear tariff distinction between iron scrap and non-alloy steel scrap.
Conclusion: The scrap was not classifiable under sub-heading 7204.10 and was correctly classifiable under sub-heading 7204.90. The appeal failed.