Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to dispensation of the pre-deposit and stay of recovery on the ground that the disputed duty demand was prima facie covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision and that the goods were claimed to be eligible for exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The application concerned waiver of pre-deposit of the duty demanded and confirmed in appeal. The Tribunal noted that the exemption claim relating to emulsifiers produced from organic surface active agents had already been covered prima facie by its earlier decision in the applicants' own case. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the applicants as having established a prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit was dispensed with and stay of recovery was granted in favour of the applicants.