Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mixed-fibre fabrics were classifiable according to the textile material predominating by weight, and whether the tolerance of 2.5% contemplated in the Board's circular could be applied in favour of the assessee for determining the predominant fibre.
Analysis: The tariff note required fabrics consisting of a mixture of two or more textile materials to be classified as if consisting wholly of the textile material which predominated by weight. The Board's circular contemplated a tolerance margin in marginal cases arising from unevenness in yarn and subsequent processing, and the reasoning was not confined only to cotton or artificial silk content. The same tolerance principle had been applied in prior Tribunal decisions and could also be justified where more than one test produced slightly different composition results. Applying the tolerance in favour of the manufacturer altered the composition so that cotton became the predominant fibre.
Conclusion: The fabrics were classifiable as cotton fabrics and not as polyester fabrics.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in its classification claim and the departmental classification order was set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: In marginal cases of blended textile fabrics, a recognised tolerance margin in the departmental circular may be applied in favour of the manufacturer for determining the fibre predominating by weight for tariff classification.