Scope of inputs under excise law: conflicting precedents on abrasive belts justified reference of a legal question to the High Court.

Abrasive belts mounted on glass-smoothing machines and used to give glass the finish required for marketability were examined under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The text notes conflicting Tribunal precedents on whether such abrasive media are merely tools or qualify more broadly as inputs used in relation to manufacture. Because the dispute concerned the correct scope of the expression "inputs" and not only the factual use of the belts, it was treated as raising a legal question under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The question of law was therefore referred to the High Court for consideration.

---

---

Issues: Whether the abrasive belts used on machines for smoothing and polishing glass were correctly treated as not being inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and whether the conflicting precedents gave rise to a referable question of law under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Analysis: The belts were found to be mounted on machines and used to impart the required finish to the glass so as to make it marketable. The record also indicated repeated use over a reasonable period. However, the judgment noted conflicting Tribunal decisions on the scope of "inputs" under Rule 57A, including earlier views treating similar abrasive media as tools and later decisions giving the expression a wider meaning to include goods used in relation to manufacture. In that setting, the issue was not merely factual but raised a legal question about the correct scope of the provision.

Conclusion: A question of law did arise, and the reference application succeeded by referring the question to the High Court for consideration.

---