Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders could stand when the assessee was not afforded a proper opportunity of hearing before the orders were passed under section 19(4) of the Mysore Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The notice issued after the initial defective service merely called upon the assessee to file objections and did not fix any date for hearing. The statutory requirement under the second proviso to section 19(4) demanded a real opportunity of being heard before the assessment was finalised. Since the objections were not taken up for hearing and the assessments were made straightaway, the orders suffered from breach of the hearing requirement.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were unsustainable and were quashed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute requires an opportunity of being heard before assessment, a notice that does not fix a hearing date and is followed by assessment without hearing the objections is invalid.