Modvat credit on abrasive materials turns on functional use: belt allowed, hand-used emery paper excluded as a processing tool.

Emery cloth belt used only with rollers in a grinding or polishing assembly was treated as part of the machinery and not an excluded input for Modvat credit, because it could not be used independently and its abrasive function on rollers did not make the rollers its accessories. By contrast, emery paper used by hand as an abrasive tool for polishing and smoothing surfaces fell within the exclusion for tools used in processing goods, and its consumable character did not change that treatment. Credit was therefore admissible for the belt but not for the emery paper.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether emery cloth belt was an excluded input and therefore ineligible for Modvat credit. (ii) Whether emery paper was an excluded tool or input and therefore ineligible for Modvat credit.

Issue (i): Whether emery cloth belt was an excluded input and therefore ineligible for Modvat credit.

Analysis: The belt was designed for use only with rollers and functioned as part of a larger grinding or polishing assembly. It could not be used independently and its use in conjunction with the rollers showed that it was not an excluded item within the relevant explanation. The fact that it performed abrasive action while mounted on rollers did not make the rollers its accessories.

Conclusion: The emery cloth belt was not an excluded input and Modvat credit was admissible; the finding against the assessee was set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether emery paper was an excluded tool or input and therefore ineligible for Modvat credit.

Analysis: The emery paper was used by hand without any machine or apparatus and functioned as an abrasive tool for polishing and smoothing surfaces. The fact that it was consumable or subject to wear did not prevent it from being treated as a tool for Modvat purposes. It fell within the exclusion for tools used in processing the goods.

Conclusion: The emery paper was correctly treated as an excluded tool and Modvat credit was not admissible.

Final Conclusion: Relief was granted only on the emery cloth belt, while denial of credit on emery paper was upheld.

---