Consumable used in manufacture qualifies for MODVAT credit even if it does not become part of the finished product.

Lap film used in burnishing magnetic diskettes was treated as an input for MODVAT credit because it was consumed in the manufacturing process, lost its original identity, and was used in relation to manufacture even though it did not form part of the finished product. The text also explains that the exclusion for machines, machinery, tools, appliances and similar items does not cover substances or consumables used within a machine to carry out manufacture. On that reasoning, lap film was not excluded as a machine, tool or appliance, and denial of MODVAT credit was unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether lap film used in the burnishing process for magnetic diskettes is an admissible input for MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944; (ii) Whether its use in the burnisher machine excludes it as a machine, tool or appliance rather than an input.

Issue (i): Whether lap film used in the burnishing process for magnetic diskettes is an admissible input for MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The lap film was found to be used in the manufacture of floppy diskettes and to have lost its original identity after use. The process of burnishing was treated as part of manufacture, and the material was held to be used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. The fact that the item need not form part of the final product did not exclude it from the scope of input credit.

Conclusion: The lap film qualified as an input and MODVAT credit was admissible.

Issue (ii): Whether its use in the burnisher machine excludes it as a machine, tool or appliance rather than an input.

Analysis: The exclusion in the rule applies to machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools and appliances used for producing or processing goods. It does not extend to substances or materials used in such machines for carrying out manufacture. Treating the lap film as excluded merely because it is used in a machine would improperly enlarge the exclusion and render the provision unworkable.

Conclusion: The lap film was not excluded as a machine, tool or appliance.

Final Conclusion: The denial of MODVAT credit was unsustainable and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: A consumable material used in and for a manufacturing process remains an input for MODVAT purposes even if it does not form part of the finished product and is used through a machine, unless the material itself falls within the specific exclusion for machines, tools or appliances.

---