Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-consideration of the time-bar issue in the earlier ex parte order constituted a mistake apparent from the record warranting rectification.
Analysis: The omission to consider a specific ground taken in appeal on limitation was treated as a mistake apparent from the record. On the materials examined, no infirmity was found in the Collector's view on the time-bar issue, and the demand was held to be barred by limitation.
Conclusion: The rectification application succeeded, and the earlier order was corrected by upholding the Collector's finding on the time-bar issue.
Final Conclusion: The application for rectification was allowed on the limited ground of non-consideration of limitation, and the impugned order was corrected accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Non-consideration of a specifically raised and material issue in appeal can amount to a mistake apparent from the record and be rectified in appropriate proceedings.