Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were required to make pre-deposit of the service tax and interest demanded, and whether the service tax liability on the services covered by section 66A could be discharged through accumulated Cenvat credit in the light of the definition of output services.
Analysis: The period in dispute preceded 01.03.2008. The exclusion of GTA services from the scope of output services was introduced only from that date. For the remaining services covered by section 66A, no corresponding exclusion from the definition of output services was shown. The liability had been discharged only through accumulated credit, and the matter disclosed a strong prima facie case with no revenue loss.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to full waiver of pre-deposit pending disposal of the appeal.