Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a job worker manufacturing goods independently on contract basis is to be treated as the manufacturer for the purpose of small-scale exemption, and whether the clearances of the raw material supplier could be clubbed for denying exemption under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The unit carried out the manufacturing activity in its own factory on contract basis. The supplier of raw materials could not be treated as the manufacturer unless the entire manufacturing activity was controlled by that supplier or the actual manufacturer was merely hired by it. On the facts found, no such control was established. The settled legal position is that a job worker who manufactures independently in terms of the contract is the manufacturer, and the clearances of the raw material supplier cannot be taken into account for exemption purposes merely because the goods were produced for that supplier.
Conclusion: The assessee alone was liable to be treated as the manufacturer, and only its own clearances were relevant for determining exemption under the notifications; the clubbing of the supplier's clearances was not justified.