Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported SF-6 gas filling and evacuation equipment was classifiable under Heading 84.14 as a gas compressor or under Heading 84.79 as a machine having individual function.
Analysis: The equipment was described as a complete integrated service unit for evacuation, filling, storage, drying and maintenance of SF-6 gas systems. The Tribunal held that it was not a composite machine made up of separately classifiable machines and that its compressor element was only one component of a self-contained system. Applying the section and chapter notes, the Tribunal found that the goods did not answer to Heading 84.14 because their essential character was not that of a gas compressor. The Tribunal further held that the machinery performed an independent and distinct function, was capable of functioning by itself, and therefore fell within Heading 84.79 as a machine having individual function not specified elsewhere.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classified under Heading 84.79 and not under Heading 84.14; the refund claim failed.