Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported parts of a cystoscope were entitled to exemption from customs duty under Notification No. 65/88-Cus. dated 01-03-1988, and alternatively under Notification No. 66/88-Cus. dated 01-03-1988.
Analysis: Notification No. 65/88-Cus. granted concessional duty to medical equipment, accessories and spare parts falling within the specified Chapters and listed in the annexed Table. Cystoscope was specifically included in the Table, and the imported goods were found to be parts/accessories of cystoscope. The exclusion taken by the lower authority on the footing that only the complete cystoscope was covered was not sustainable. In any event, Notification No. 66/88-Cus. extended exemption to component parts of goods covered by Notification No. 65/88-Cus. when imported for manufacture of the said goods. Once the goods were accepted as parts of cystoscope specified in Notification No. 65/88-Cus., they were independently eligible for the alternative exemption.
Conclusion: The imported goods were exempted from duty under the notification scheme and the assessee was entitled to relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a notification exempts specified medical equipment and its parts or accessories, parts of an item expressly listed in the notification are covered, and an alternative notification extending exemption to component parts of such specified goods also applies.