Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts representing turnover tax and additional sales tax, not collected from buyers, could be excluded from assessable value and support refund of excess duty, and whether the claims required reconsideration in the light of limitation and Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The duty element referable to turnover tax and additional sales tax was treated as not forming part of the assessable value where such amounts were not recoverable from buyers, making the refund claim substantively tenable. However, the record did not show consideration of the limitation objection raised in respect of several claims, and the impact of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 also required examination on the factual position of each claim.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not finally adjudicated on merits and the matter required fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, particularly on limitation and the effect of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.